Archive for September, 2010

UW’s party-school rankings

Sunday, September 26th, 2010

In August, the Princeton Review came out with its annual 62 top-20 lists for colleges, and of course the one that gets the most attention is its party-school ranking. This year the University of Wisconsin-Madison placed 12th, which in my memory seemed pretty low, especially compared to previous years. So I contacted the Princeton Review, and the staff graciously provided rankings through 1992.

It turns out my hunch was (mostly) correct. The No. 12 slot is the lowest since UW was ranked the same in 1995. If history holds, UW could be looking at low rankings for the next couple of years before it climbs again. I guess that makes sense: each “block” of grades matches one graduating class (four years).

From 1992 to 1995, UW was 14th, 12th, 12th and 12th, respectively. Then it jumped to sixth, second and second from 1996 to 1998. The next four years see listings of unranked, ninth, unranked and 10th, then Nos. 2, 3, 1 and 4 from 2003 to 2006.

Last year UW took eighth, which appeared to be the start of another “slump” when paired with this year’s No. 12 ranking. (However, if you count 2007’s and 2008’s no ranking, then UW just ended  a block and will start another one next year.)

By the way, the Princeton Review bases the rankings of colleges on “the use of alcohol and drugs on their campus, the number of hours (the surveyed students) study each day outside class, and the popularity of the Greek scene on their campuses.” As with all surveys, you can probably these results with a grain of salt.

YEAR – RANK*
2010 – 12
2009 – 8
2008 – UR
2007 – UR
2006 – 4
2005 – 1
2004 – 3
2003 – 2
2002 – 10
2001 – UR
2000 – 9
1999 – UR
1998 – 2
1997 – 2
1996 – 6
1995 – 12
1994 – 12
1993 – 12
1992 – 14

*source: the Princeton Review

My tab on a tab(let)

Friday, September 17th, 2010

The New York Times wrote about a restaurant using an iPad to show case its wine list. With better ways of sorting the wines and helping diners find a good one to accompany their meal, wine sales have increased 11 percent.

It’ll probably be a long time before menus are replaced with tablet devices, since they’re too expensive to have enough for menus (tablet menus for a table for four would cost ~$1,200). But I don’t see a reason why the waitstaff can’t have them. It’d be a nice way to enhance service, as the waiter could refer to the tablet for specials, double-check items for certain food allergens (e.g. peanuts) and send the exact order to the kitchen.

Taking this a step further, I wonder how long it will be before the majority of restaurants have a computer screen at each table that you can use to place your order. You could see a picture of each item, perhaps its nutritional information and order when you’re ready to order. The restaurant would only need a handful of servers just to bring the food out. If the patron needs water, for example, they would only have to enter it in the system rather than flag down a waiter.

Going back to the restaurant using the iPads, that’s an expensive investment ($499 each in the story) to sell some wine (which I know carries a hefty mark-up at restaurants). I wonder why they didn’t buy a cheaper tablet device, since I doubt the iPad is being used for any other function. Sort of a waste of a gadget capable of so much more, and the risk of a patron spilling onto it or dropping it could be a concern.

Lastly, I doubt we’ll see them in Madison-area restaurants anytime soon. Disagree?

What if you couldn’t eat?

Friday, September 3rd, 2010

Film critic Roger Ebert’s cancer a few years ago took his lower jaw, his ability to eat and his ability to talk. Yet he still goes out to meals with his friends (because he enjoys the social aspect) and he still cooks.

After reading the New York Times article about Ebert, I’m not so sure I could follow in his footsteps. Regarding going out to eat, it would just be so hard to sit there and watch your companions enjoy their meal while you just sit there and salivate. It would be like quitting smoking and then being surrounded by smokers–the temptation could be overwhelming.

While I love cooking, especially for others, I think I would lose an edge in not being able to try things as I cook–how would I know if the sauce needed another pince of salt, for example? For that matter, how the hell did a deaf Beethoven compose Symphony No. 9?

Worse, I get enough cravings as it is, but at least I can always satisfy them (pizza at 2 a.m.? No problem). I’m sure Ebert must get sick of his Isosource that he “drinks” for his meals, which can’t do much to quench his longing for something else, like Steak ‘n Shake, as mentioned in the article.

I won’t even try to list all the foods I would miss, because there are just too many. But I’d love to hear from you: what foods would you miss? would you still cook and go out to eat?

    Madison Symphony Orchestra Urban Air

  • Blog Home

    You are currently browsing the EatDrinkMadison.com blog archives for September, 2010.

  • Archives

  • Categories